Psychiatry · Primary Care · Adolescent Medicine
SCOFF Eating Disorder Screen calculator
Enter the published formula inputs below to calculate and interpret this score.
Clinical inputs
Result
Anyone can run this calculator. Sign in to save, favourite, or send the result.
0
SCOFF <2 — negative screen
Band: SCOFF <2 — negative screen
Interpretation. SCOFF <2 — negative screen
Suggested management. Negative SCOFF screen for eating disorder.
SCOFF Eating Disorder Screen: 0 — SCOFF <2 — negative screen. Interpretation: SCOFF <2 — negative screen What to do: Negative SCOFF screen for eating disorder. Inputs: Do you make yourself Sick because you feel uncomfortably full?: false; Do you worry you have lost Control over how much you eat?: false; Have you recently lost more than One stone (14 lb / 6.3 kg) in a 3-month period?: false; Do you believe yourself to be Fat when others say you are too thin?: false; Would you say that Food dominates your life?: false Source: Morgan JF, Reid F, Lacey JH. The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders. BMJ. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467. PMID: 10582927. Scope: five yes/no SCOFF items (Sick, Control, One stone, Fat, Food); ≥2 affirmative answers raises suspicion for anorexia or bulimia nervosa and warrants further assessment. (1999)
Ruqelo is AI and can make mistakes. Check important information.
Clinical inputs
- Do you make yourself Sick because you feel uncomfortably full?
- Do you worry you have lost Control over how much you eat?
- Have you recently lost more than One stone (14 lb / 6.3 kg) in a 3-month period?
- Do you believe yourself to be Fat when others say you are too thin?
- Would you say that Food dominates your life?
Primary source
Morgan JF, Reid F, Lacey JH. The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders. BMJ. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467. PMID: 10582927. Scope: five yes/no SCOFF items (Sick, Control, One stone, Fat, Food); ≥2 affirmative answers raises suspicion for anorexia or bulimia nervosa and warrants further assessment. (1999)
View source