Allergy and Immunology
SULF-FAST calculator
Enter the published formula inputs below to calculate and interpret this score.
Clinical inputs
Result
4 fields remaining
Anyone can run this calculator. Sign in to save, favourite, or send the result.
Ruqelo is AI and can make mistakes. Check important information.
Clinical inputs
- Time since the reaction
- Anaphylaxis or angioedema
- Severe cutaneous adverse reaction
- Treatment required for the reaction
Primary source
Waldron JL et al. Development and Validation of a Sulfa Antibiotic Allergy Clinical Decision Rule. JAMA Netw Open. PMID: 37273210. The main text adapts the penicillin rule as SULF-FAST and says a score below 3 carried a low allergy risk (below 5% in the Australian cohort) while a score of 3 or more had a higher allergy risk (above 20% in the Australian cohort). Supplement 1 eMethods says the total score used the scoring algorithm in the eFigure. That eFigure prints 2 points for five years or less since the reaction, 2 points for anaphylaxis or angioedema or a severe cutaneous adverse reaction, and 1 point for treatment required. Footnote a, Includes unknown, is printed on the five-year row and on the treatment row. Footnote b lists Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and says a severe delayed rash with mucosal involvement counts as a severe cutaneous adverse reaction. Anaphylaxis or angioedema and a severe cutaneous adverse reaction are one 2-point row, so both findings still add 2 points. The penicillin interpretation panel in the same figure (very low, low, moderate, and high penicillin test-risk percentages) is not the sulfa cutoff. Acute interstitial nephritis, drug-induced liver injury, serum sickness, and isolated drug fever were excluded phenotypes. (2023)
View source